<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Tao Capital — Perspectives</title><link>https://tao-capital.pages.dev/perspectives/</link><description>Tao Capital is a Hong Kong-based private investment firm investing permanent capital in private equity, growth capital and liquid strategies across technology, healthcare and selected sectors.</description><language>en</language><atom:link href="https://tao-capital.pages.dev/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The cost of a deadline</title><link>https://tao-capital.pages.dev/perspectives/the-cost-of-a-deadline</link><guid>https://tao-capital.pages.dev/perspectives/the-cost-of-a-deadline</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[<p>Every fund carries a date, and every date carries a cost. The cost is rarely visible in the returns table, because it is paid by the business: the sale that happened two years early, the expansion that was not funded because the fund was in harvest mode, the management team that spent its best year preparing for an exit rather than running the company.</p>
      <p>Permanent capital removes the date. That does not make the investor less disciplined — the discipline simply moves from the calendar to the business. The question is no longer "when do we sell" but "is this still the right owner for this company". Often the answer is yes for a very long time. Occasionally it is no, and then a sale is made for the business's reasons rather than the investor's.</p>
      <p>The practical effect is that a permanent-capital investor can behave like a founder: patient with growth, impatient with waste, and indifferent to the noise in between.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Operators make better owners</title><link>https://tao-capital.pages.dev/perspectives/operators-make-better-owners</link><guid>https://tao-capital.pages.dev/perspectives/operators-make-better-owners</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[<p>Technology is easy to admire and hard to own. The economics of a software or infrastructure business are visible in a spreadsheet; whether they survive contact with customers, regulators and competitors is visible only from the inside.</p>
      <p>Having built technology operating companies, the firm reads a technology business differently. It asks who actually pays, how long they stay, what it costs to serve them, and what happens when a well-funded competitor decides the same market is attractive. It is sceptical of growth that is bought and respectful of growth that is earned.</p>
      <p>That is not caution for its own sake. Concentrated, long-held positions in technology businesses with real economics have been among the best investments of the past two decades. The point is to find the businesses, not the narratives.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Healthcare rewards the long view</title><link>https://tao-capital.pages.dev/perspectives/healthcare-rewards-the-long-view</link><guid>https://tao-capital.pages.dev/perspectives/healthcare-rewards-the-long-view</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 09:00:00 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[<p>Demand for healthcare is structural, long-dated and, across Asia in particular, still catching up with income. Few sectors offer that combination. Few sectors also punish impatience so reliably: regulatory timelines are long, evidence takes years to build, and reputations in healthcare are earned slowly and lost quickly.</p>
      <p>This makes healthcare a natural home for permanent capital. A provider, a service or an enabling technology that needs five years to reach maturity is a poor fit for a fund with a five-year hold, and a good fit for an owner who does not need to sell. The firm looks for businesses with regulatory maturity, evidence-based products and management capable of building across markets, and is prepared to wait for them.</p>]]></description></item></channel></rss>